On (Mon) Jan 04 2010 [19:45:30], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:04:28 am Amit Shah wrote:
> > The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle this
> > situation by buffering the data.
>
> Is this still true? If we only add_buf when we're ready, surely the host
> can't
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:04:28 am Amit Shah wrote:
> The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle this
> situation by buffering the data.
Is this still true? If we only add_buf when we're ready, surely the host
can't flood us with one virtqueue per port?
Thanks,
Rusty.
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:38:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> I thought this was what I was doing, but I have shown over and over that
> I have no idea about block devices.
>
> Our current driver treats BLK_SIZE as the logical and physical size (see
> blk_queue_logical_block_size).
>
> I have
