Re: vmbus driver

2011-05-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I see maintainers for each of the clocksource drivers and I see John Stultz and Thomas Gleixner listed as the maintainers for Timekeeping. Who should sign-off on the Hyper-V clocksource. just send it to both of the with linux-kernel in Cc, and either of them will probably put it in.

Re: [PATCHv2 10/14] virtio_net: limit xmit polling

2011-05-22 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:49:59AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011 02:11:56 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation if there are many pending bufs at the time we attempt to transmit a new one. This is bad for

RE: vmbus driver

2011-05-22 Thread KY Srinivasan
-Original Message- From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 7:00 AM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: Christoph Hellwig; gre...@suse.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualizat...@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: vmbus driver

Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix patch: virtio_net: limit xmit polling

2011-05-22 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 05:00:17PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2011 01:01:25 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: The patch virtio_net: limit xmit polling got the logic reversed: it polled while we had capacity not while ring was empty. Fix it up and clean

Re: [PATCHv2 10/14] virtio_net: limit xmit polling

2011-05-22 Thread Rusty Russell
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:10:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:49:59AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011 02:11:56 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: Current code might introduce a lot of latency variation if there