Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/23/2011 04:49:00 PM:
To do this properly, we should really be using the actual number of sg
elements needed, but we'd have to do most of xmit_skb beforehand so we
know how many.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Maybe I'm confused here. The problem isn't
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:24:15PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/23/2011 04:49:00 PM:
To do this properly, we should really be using the actual number of sg
elements needed, but we'd have to do most of xmit_skb beforehand so we
know how
Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
virtio:event_index_interface.patch
virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/24/2011 02:42:55 PM:
To do this properly, we should really be using the actual number of
sg
elements needed, but we'd have to do most of xmit_skb beforehand so
we
know how many.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Maybe I'm confused here.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:57:43PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/24/2011 02:42:55 PM:
To do this properly, we should really be using the actual number of
sg
elements needed, but we'd have to do most of xmit_skb beforehand so
we
know
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/24/2011 04:59:39 PM:
Maybe Rusty means it is a simpler model to free the amount
of space that this xmit needs. We will still fail anyway
at some time but it is unlikely, since earlier iteration
freed up atleast the space that it was
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:20:35PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 05/24/2011 04:59:39 PM:
Maybe Rusty means it is a simpler model to free the amount
of space that this xmit needs. We will still fail anyway
at some time but it is unlikely,
On Thursday 19 May 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
# cat /proc/tile/board
board_part: 402-2-05
board_serial: NBS-5002-00012
chip_serial: P62338.01.110
chip_revision: A0
board_revision: 2.2
board_description: Tilera TILExpressPro-64, TILEPro64 processor (866
MHz-capable), 1
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:19:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:37:15AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Can we hit problems with OOM? Sure, but no worse than now...
The problem is that this virtqueue_get_capacity() returns the worst
case, not the
On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
virtio:event_index_interface.patch
virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:19:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
I do understand how it seems a waste to leave direct space
in the ring while we might in practice have space
due to indirect. Didn't come up with a nice way to
solve this yet - but 'no worse than now :)'
Let's just
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:58:26AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:19:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:37:15AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Can we hit problems with OOM? Sure, but no worse than now...
The problem is that
12 matches
Mail list logo
