On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:03:04AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:04 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:18:45PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:18:38 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > > wrote:
> > > > My unlocked k
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:56:50 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:44 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > I'll post v3 tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Ok, it won't be v3 then...
>
> I tried again, using your suggestions - see below (just the crucial bit,
> however I have the kernel-parameters.tx
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:44:48 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 03:32 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 2) Doesn't leak mem on error paths.
>
> Em, I don't think my code was leaking memory in any error case? (no
> offence meant or taken ;-)
You're right, I'm wrong. In your original
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:16:38 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey wrote:
> Thanks, Rusty. I'm not using QEMU though, just KVM. I create the device,
> wait
> for the message from the guest that the device is ready, and then add ports.
>
> Miche
OK, since Amit was the one who implemented multi-port conso
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:04 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:18:45PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:18:38 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > wrote:
> > > My unlocked kick patches will trip this warning: they make
> > > virtio-net do add + get
Thanks, Rusty. I'm not using QEMU though, just KVM. I create the device, wait
for the message from the guest that the device is ready, and then add ports.
Miche
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:57:37 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey
> wrote:
>> Rusty,
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 18:18 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:40 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:24 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 01:08 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:34 +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> >
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:24 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 01:08 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:34 +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > > Changes for multiqueue virtio_net driver.
> > [...]
> > > @@ -677,25 +730,35 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:34 +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> Changes for multiqueue virtio_net driver.
[...]
> @@ -677,25 +730,35 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> int cpu;
> - unsigned int start;
>
> for_each_possi
Rusty, Michael, Stephen, et al,
Thanks for your comments on these patches.
For what I'm trying to do, all three patches are necessary, but maybe
I'm going about it the wrong way. Your input would be appreciated.
I'm in no way claiming that these patches are "right", just that it's
working for me,
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:44 +, Pawel Moll wrote:
> I'll post v3 tonight or tomorrow.
Ok, it won't be v3 then...
I tried again, using your suggestions - see below (just the crucial bit,
however I have the kernel-parameters.txt bits ready as well). Parsing
works like charm, however when it gets
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 03:32 +, Rusty Russell wrote:
> No it's not; I didn't bother when I converted things across, and it
> shows.
546970bc (Rusty Russell 2010-08-11 23:04:20 -0600 133) #define module_param_cb
Now I understand... :-)
> But we expect virtio hackers to be smarter than aver
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:18:45PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:18:38 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> > My unlocked kick patches will trip this warning: they make
> > virtio-net do add + get without kick.
>
> Heh, it's a good sign if they do, since that means you'r
13 matches
Mail list logo
