On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:25:43AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
But I'm *terrified* of making the spec more complex;
All you do is move stuff around. Why do you think it simplifies the spec
so much?
No, but it reduces the yuk factor. Which has been important to adoption.
Sorry if I'm
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
I'd like to see kvmtools remove support for legacy mode altogether,
but they probably have existing users.
While we can't simply remove it right away, instead of mixing our
implementation for both legacy and new spec in the same code we
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:25:15 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm using ixgbe for testing also, for host, its driver seems provide irq
affinity hint, so no binding or irqbalance is needed.
The hint is for irqbalance to use. You need to still do manual
affinity or use irqbalance.
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang amw...@redhat.com
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index c14c42b..bdb2d64 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -937,9 +937,9 @@
Amit,
You said that the work would be serialized due to port additions
being on work items on the same workqueue. I'm not seeing that.
I've double checked this by using a mutex_trylock in
hvc_console::hvc_alloc(), and here's the relevant output from dmesg:
root@myubuntu:~# dmesg | grep MBH
