[PULL] virtio

2012-10-04 Thread Rusty Russell
The following changes since commit 925a6f0bf8bd122d5d2429af7f0ca0fecf4ae71f: Merge tag 'hwspinlock-3.6-fix' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/hwspinlock (2012-09-18 11:58:54 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ru

Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization.

2012-10-04 Thread Anthony Liguori
Rusty Russell writes: > Hi all, > > I've had several requests for a more formal approach to the > virtio draft spec, and (after some soul-searching) I'd like to try that. > > The proposal is to use OASIS as the standards body, as it's > fairly light-weight as these things go. For me

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

2012-10-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 04/10/2012 14:51, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite > number of them, for

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

2012-10-04 Thread Rusty Russell
Paolo Bonzini writes: > Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> > > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my >> > > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite >> > > number of them, for each bug in each device. >> > >> > However, this

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

2012-10-04 Thread Rusty Russell
Anthony Liguori writes: >> lguest fix is pending in my queue. lkvm and qemu are broken; lkvm isn't >> ever going to be merged, so I'm not sure what its status is? But I'm >> determined to fix qemu, and hence my torture patch to make sure this >> doesn't creep in again. > > There are even more im

Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support

2012-10-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > > > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my > > > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite > > > number of them, for each bug in each device. > > > > However, this bug affects (almost) all implem