On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:41:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/05/2013 15:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
You expect a compiler to pad this structure:
struct foo {
uint8_t a;
uint8_t b;
uint16_t c;
uint32_t d;
};
I'm guessing any compiler that
Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
On the receive side, what can we do better than readv? If we need to
return to userspace to tell the guest that we've got a new packet, we
don't win on latency. We might
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:28:26PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Yet the structure definitions are descriptive, capturing layout, size
and endianness in natural a format readable by any C programmer.
From an API design point of view, here are the problems I see:
1) C makes no guarantees
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FWIW, I think what's more interesting is using vhost-net as a networking
backend with
Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
FWIW, I think
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
wrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
On Fri,
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Forcing a guest driver change is a really big
deal and I see no reason to do that unless there's a compelling reason
to.
So we're stuck with the 1.0 config layout for a very long time.
We definitely
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:53:45AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au writes:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Forcing a guest driver change is a really big
deal and I see no reason to do that unless there's a compelling reason
to.
So we're
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:40:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
wrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Rusty
On 26-05-2013 17:38, Jiang Liu wrote:
Typo in the subject: s/mamaged_pages/managed_pages/.
Enhance adjust_managed_page_count() to adjust totalhigh_pages for
highmem pages. And change code which directly adjusts totalram_pages
to use adjust_managed_page_count() because it adjusts
correct.
If I have an indirect ring and I'm adding sgs to it and the host is
delayed (say I've got a thread consuming things from the vring and its
off doing something interesting),
I'd really like to get ENOSPC back from virtqueue_add. However if the
indirect addition fails due to free_sg
On 23/05/13 05:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hey guys,
I've updated the kvm networking todo wiki with current projects.
Will try to keep it up to date more often.
Original announcement below.
I've put up a wiki page with a kvm networking todo list,
mainly to avoid effort duplication,
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.auwrote:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 26/05/2013 22:02, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
My fault. I should have looked at linux/types.h (actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
