On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:00:05PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
>> >> On
- Doctoral Symposium of CISTI'2016 -
CISTI'2016 - 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies
15 - 18 june, 2016, Gran Canaria Island, Span
http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2016/index.php/en/doctoral-symposium
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> If I had a technical solution to this problem I'd propose it but I don't,
> I'm just flagging it right now and hope we can come up with one.
Shortly I'll be posting part of a proactive solution I believe we
could
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:45:29PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > + if (head == vq->num) {
> > + if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(>dev, vq))) {
> > + vhost_disable_notify(>dev, vq);
> > + continue;
>
> Why are we doing
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:19:08PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > +config VHOST_VSOCK
> > + tristate "vhost virtio-vsock driver"
> > + depends on VSOCKETS && EVENTFD
> > + select VIRTIO_VSOCKETS_COMMON
> > + select VHOST
> > + select VHOST_RING
> > + default n
> > + ---help---
> > +
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:00:05PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 07/12/15 16:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > this patch series introduces
On 19/11/15 22:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> The first patch fixes Xen PV regression introduced by 32-bit rewrite. Unlike
>> the
>> earlier version it uses ALTERNATIVE instruction and avoids using xen_sysexit
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 19/11/15 22:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
>> wrote:
>>> The first patch fixes Xen PV regression introduced by 32-bit rewrite.
>>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:27:52AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:00:05PM +, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 07/12/15 16:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > this
On 12/15/2015 10:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:21:37AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
I know this has been in the tip tree --- when do you think this will go
Linus tree? In the 4.4 timeframe?
It is queued for 4.5 currently.
Xen 32-bit PV guests are broken without
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 10:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:21:37AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> I know this has been in the tip tree --- when do you think this will go
>>> Linus
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:45:32AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> >> wrote:
On 11/19/2015 04:55 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
After 32-bit syscall rewrite, and specifically after commit 5f310f739b4c
("x86/entry/32: Re-implement SYSENTER using the new C path"), the stack
frame that is passed to xen_sysexit is no longer a "standard" one (i.e.
it's not pt_regs).
Since we end
13 matches
Mail list logo