Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] vring: Use the DMA API on Xen

2016-02-03 Thread David Vrabel
On 03/02/16 05:46, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski You forgot the previous Reviewed-by tags. David ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] virtio_ring: Support DMA APIs

2016-02-03 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:46:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't > always the case. For example,

Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: add ethtool support for set and get of settings

2016-02-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:51:20 +0100 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > +static bool virtnet_validate_speed(u32 speed) > +{ > + switch (speed) { > + case SPEED_10: > + case SPEED_100: > + case SPEED_1000: > + case SPEED_2500: > + case SPEED_5000: > + case

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-02-03 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > module option. > > This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's > off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. > > To the Xen people: is this okay? If

Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] virtio_ring: Support DMA APIs

2016-02-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Feb 3, 2016 5:52 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:46:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > > addresses and physical