On 2016年06月30日 23:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:45:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to
>eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The
>conversion was straightforward: ju
On Thu, 06/30 15:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > It is documented that KOBJ_ADD should be generated after the object's
> > attributes and children are ready. We can achieve this with the new
> > disk_gen_uevents interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fam
On Wed, 06/29 23:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:35:54PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > also more code and less flexible IMO. For example, we need at least two
> > variants, for attribute_group and device_attribute separately, right?
>
> Yes, or maybe just a calling convent
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:45:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to
> eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The
> conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use
> it instead
