On 2017年02月28日 02:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年12月14日 17:53, Jason Wang wrote:
When device IOTLB is enabled, all address translations were stored in
interval tree. O(lgN) searching time could be slow for virtqueue
metadata
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:45:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:01:57PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Any chance to get this in for 4.11 after I got reviews from Jason
> > > > for most
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:01:57PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Any chance to get this in for 4.11 after I got reviews from Jason
> > > for most of the patches?
> >
> > Absolutely, I intend to merge it.
>
> So, what is
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年12月14日 17:53, Jason Wang wrote:
> > When device IOTLB is enabled, all address translations were stored in
> > interval tree. O(lgN) searching time could be slow for virtqueue
> > metadata (avail, used and descriptors) since
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:01:57PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Any chance to get this in for 4.11 after I got reviews from Jason
> > for most of the patches?
>
> Absolutely, I intend to merge it.
So, what is the plan for virtio this merge window? No changes seem
to have made it into lin
