On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年08月30日 03:35, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Willem de Bruijn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
On 2017年08月30日 03:35, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 06:44:36PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
We don't
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:53:08PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:35:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:02:29PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> + virtio-dev
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
+ virtio-dev
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:53:08PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:35:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >> By the way, I have had an unrelated patch outstanding for a while
> >> to have
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:27:41PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >> From: Willem de Bruijn
> >>
> >> Implement a mechanism to
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> From: Willem de Bruijn
>>
>> Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:58PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn
>
> Implement the reset communication request defined in the VIRTIO 1.0
> specification and introduces in Linux in commit c00bbcf862896 ("virtio:
> add VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:59PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn
>
> Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
>
> Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the
From: Willem de Bruijn
Implement VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET (patch 1) and
add a feature bit to signal support (patch 2)
Further details in the individual patches.
Willem de Bruijn (2):
virtio_net: implement VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
virtio_net: enable probing for
From: Willem de Bruijn
Implement the reset communication request defined in the VIRTIO 1.0
specification and introduces in Linux in commit c00bbcf862896 ("virtio:
add VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET device status bit").
Since that patch, the virtio-net driver has added a
From: Willem de Bruijn
Implement a mechanism to signal that a virtio device implements the
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET command.
Testing for VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET support by issuing the request
and verifying the reset state would require an expensive state change.
To
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:35:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> By the way, I have had an unrelated patch outstanding for a while
>> to have virtio-net support the VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
>> command. Will send
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:35:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> By the way, I have had an unrelated patch outstanding for a while
> to have virtio-net support the VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET
> command. Will send that as RFC.
Oh nice. One needs to be careful about locking there which is why
no
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:46:35AM +, Yang Zhang wrote:
> So far, pv_idle_ops.poll is the only ops for pv_idle. .poll is called in
> idle path which will polling for a while before we enter the real idle
> state.
>
> In virtualization, idle path includes several heavy operations
> includes
On 08/29/2017 05:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:30:33PM +0200, Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
Hi,
I have CCed the relevant mailing lists and people most recently involved
in virtio-balloon discussions. Hopefully this will help get the right
people to see your questions.
To reduce the cost of poll, we introduce three sysctl to control the
poll time.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Quan Xu
Cc: Jonathan Corbet
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Cc: Chris Wright
Cc:
.update is used to adjust the next poll time.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang
Signed-off-by: Quan Xu
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Cc: Chris Wright
Cc: Alok Kataria
Cc: Rusty Russell
So far, pv_idle_ops.poll is the only ops for pv_idle. .poll is called in
idle path which will polling for a while before we enter the real idle
state.
In virtualization, idle path includes several heavy operations
includes timer access(LAPIC timer or TSC deadline timer) which will hurt
20 matches
Mail list logo