On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio patch
> :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by tag, but
> you can
take my acked-by + tested-by.
Acked-by: Jakub Staron
Tested-by: Jakub Staron
No kern
From: Stefano Garzarella
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:45:43 +0200
> When the socket is released, we should free all packets
> queued in the per-socket list in order to avoid a memory
> leak.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella
Applied and queued up for -stable.
_
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:57:22PM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On May 17, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:10:23PM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >>> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >>>
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Am
> On May 17, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:10:23PM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>
On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
VMware balloon enhancements: adding support for memo
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:10:23PM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >>
> >> VMware balloon enhancements: adding support for memory compaction,
> >> memory shrinker (to prevent OOM) and splitting
> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>
>> VMware balloon enhancements: adding support for memory compaction,
>> memory shrinker (to prevent OOM) and splitting of refused pages to
>> prevent recurring inflations.
>>
>> Patches 1-2:
When the socket is released, we should free all packets
queued in the per-socket list in order to avoid a memory
leak.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella
---
This patch was in the series "[PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: optimizations
to increase the throughput" [1]. As Stefan suggested, I'm sending i
Hi,
> It turns out that the bochs and vbox drivers automatically reserved and
> unreserved the BO from within their pin and unpin functions. The other
> drivers; ast, hibmc and mgag200; performed reservation explicitly. With the
> GEM VRAM conversion, automatic BO reservation within pin and unpi
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:29:48AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi:
>
> This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through
> vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight
> after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of
> vsock and virtio-net.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 01:51:07PM -0700, Jorge E. Moreira wrote:
> Avoid a race in which static variables in net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c are
> accessed (while handling interrupts) before they are initialized.
>
> [4.201410] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffe8
> [4
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:32:18PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:58:37PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > When the socket is released, we should free all packets
> > queued in the per-socket list in order to avoid a memory
> > leak.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano G
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:25:33PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:58:36PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > +struct virtio_vsock_buf {
>
> Please add a comment describing the purpose of this struct and to
> differentiate its use from struct virtio_vsock_pkt.
>
Sure
12 matches
Mail list logo
