On 8/18/21 3:00 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
>> For passthrough, when the corresponding virtiofs in guest is mounted
>> with '-o dax=inode', advertise that the file is capable of per-file
>> DAX if the inode in the backend fs is marked with
On 8/18/21 1:15 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
>> In FUSE_INIT negotiating phase, server/client should advertise if it
>> supports per-file DAX.
>>
>> Once advertising support for per-file DAX feature, virtiofsd should
>> support storing FS_DA
On 8/17/21 10:57 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:53PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/21 8:39 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
>
> This patchset a
On 8/17/21 10:54 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:08:35PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/21 6:09 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 11:32, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
>>> wrote:
* Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2
> From: Jason Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 10:02 AM
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:15 AM Parav Pandit wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm inclined to say vxlan is closer to a model to follow.
> > Ok. thanks for the feedback. We are using the model close to vxlan.
> > Lets resolve should we have it
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:15 AM Parav Pandit wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 2:24 AM
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:51:49AM +, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 3:10 PM
> > > >
> > > > O
On 8/17/21 10:08 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 15:22, JeffleXu wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/21 8:39 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
>
> This patchset adds s
Set of-node of the adapter to the virtio device's of-node to enable
automatic parsing the of the I2C devices, if present in the DT.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c b/drivers/i2c/bu
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 2:24 AM
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 09:51:49AM +, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 3:10 PM
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:55:56AM +, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:57 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:01 PM Eli Cohen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:48:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 1:26 PM Eli Cohen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:19:55PM +0800, Jason Wang w
On 2021/8/18 4:22, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin
Okay, with rc6 being released, I won't wait for an immutable branch
anymore. I applied this now and we will see if there will be a merge
conflict. If so, it will be trivial to handle, I'd think. So:
Applied to for-next, thanks!
T
* Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
> For passthrough, when the corresponding virtiofs in guest is mounted
> with '-o dax=inode', advertise that the file is capable of per-file
> DAX if the inode in the backend fs is marked with FS_DAX_FL flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu
> ---
> to
Hi Xianting,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on tty/tty-testing]
[also build test WARNING on char-misc/char-misc-testing soc/for-next v5.14-rc6
next-20210817]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when
* Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
> In FUSE_INIT negotiating phase, server/client should advertise if it
> supports per-file DAX.
>
> Once advertising support for per-file DAX feature, virtiofsd should
> support storing FS_DAX_FL flag persistently passed by
> FS_IOC_SETFLAGS/FS_IOC_F
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> We tested the patch, it worked normally.
Who is "we"?
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian
Like I said before, I need another developer from your company to review
and sign-off on this patch (and the other one), before I am willing to
l
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:11:14PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
[..]
> > As for virtiofs, Dr. David Alan Gilbert has mentioned that various files
> > may compete for limited DAX window resource.
> >
> > Besides, supporting DAX for small files can be expensive. Small files
> > can consume DAX windo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:22:53PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/21 8:39 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, whic
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:08:35PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/21 6:09 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 11:32, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> * Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu
> >>> wrote:
>
On 8/17/21 6:26 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
>> When the per-file DAX indication changes while the file is still
>> *opened*, it is quite complicated and maybe fragile to dynamically
>> change the DAX state.
>>
>> Hence mark the inode and co
On 8/17/21 8:39 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, which is
>>> inspired by Ira Weiny's work on ext4[1] and xfs[2].
>>
>> Can
On 8/17/21 6:09 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 11:32, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
>>
>> * Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, which is
inspir
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> >
> > This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, which is
> > inspired by Ira Weiny's work on ext4[1] and xfs[2].
>
> Can you please explain the background of this chan
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, which is
> > > inspired by Ira Weiny's work on ext4[1] and x
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:44:39AM -0700, Marc Orr wrote:
> To date, we have _most_ x86 test cases (39/44) working under UEFI and
> we've also got some of the test cases to boot under SEV-ES, using the
> UEFI #VC handler.
While the EFI APP approach simplifies the implementation a lot, I
* Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 11:32, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
> >
> > * Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, whic
* Jeffle Xu (jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com) wrote:
> When the per-file DAX indication changes while the file is still
> *opened*, it is quite complicated and maybe fragile to dynamically
> change the DAX state.
>
> Hence mark the inode and corresponding dentries as DONE_CACHE once the
* Miklos Szeredi (mik...@szeredi.hu) wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 04:22, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> >
> > This patchset adds support of per-file DAX for virtiofs, which is
> > inspired by Ira Weiny's work on ext4[1] and xfs[2].
>
> Can you please explain the background of this change in detail?
>
> W
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:01 PM Eli Cohen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:48:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 1:26 PM Eli Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:19:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 在 2021/8/17 下午12:03, Parav Pandit 写道:
> > >
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:46 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> Patch is good. Suggest some tweaks to the commit log.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:03:38AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Commit a02e8964eaf92 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") tries to
> > advertise LRO on behalf of the guest of
Commit a02e8964eaf92 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
maps LRO to virtio guest offloading features and allows the
administrator to enable and disable those features via ethtool.
This leads to several issues:
- For a device that doesn't support control guest offloads, the "LRO"
can't be
30 matches
Mail list logo
