On 04/23/2012 05:00 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
From: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
...
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+KVM Hypercalls Documentation
+===
+Template for documentation is
+The
From: Rob Landley rland...@parallels.com
Going indirect for only two buffers isn't likely to be a performance win
because the kmalloc/kfree overhead for the indirect block can't be cheaper
than one extra linked list traversal.
Properly tuning the threshold would probably be workload-specific
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:35:22 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 18:22 -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007 9:01:48 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
IOW, I'd be interested in hearing Rob and Randy's opinions on it all,
please.
So they can see what we're talking
On Monday 23 July 2007 9:01:48 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
IOW, I'd be interested in hearing Rob and Randy's opinions on it all,
please.
So they can see what we're talking about, here's an example of the
output:
http://lguest.ozlabs.org/lguest-journey.c.bz2
Er, so you read the readme,
On Monday 23 July 2007 10:21:13 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:12:38 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:17:58 +1000
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The netfilter code had very good documentation: the Netfilter Hacking
HOWTO. Noone ever read it.
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 7:41 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
This makes vmlinux (normally stripped) recoverable from the bzImage file
and so anything that is currently booting vmlinux would be serviced by
this scheme.
Would this make it sane to strip the initramfs image out of vmlinux with