On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:52:35PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:10:02 +0200
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:15:12 +0200
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:52:35PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
Once you sort this out, reply with an Acked-by: for me, thanks.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Applied.
On 12/08/2011 12:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:10:02 +0200
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:25:15 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm using ixgbe for testing also, for host, its driver seems provide irq
affinity hint, so no binding or irqbalance is needed.
The hint is for irqbalance to use. You need to still do manual
affinity or use irqbalance.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:39:11AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0 move to
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost
On 11/25/2011 12:09 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to
On 11/28/2011 01:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar krkum...@in.ibm.com
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 16
On 11/24/2011 04:17 PM, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumarkrkum...@in.ibm.com
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
So this is sure to address
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used
On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when
On 11/24/2011 07:14 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:00:52PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 07:14 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:56:45PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was
jasowang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 06:30:52 PM:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet
On 11/25/2011 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:56:45PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24,
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 09:44:31 PM:
As far as I can see, ixgbe binds queues to physical cpu, so let
consider:
vhost thread transmits packets of flow A on processor M
during packet transmission, ixgbe driver programs the card to
deliver the packet of flow
On 11/25/2011 10:58 AM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
jasowangjasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 06:30:52 PM:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets
On 11/25/2011 11:07 AM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com wrote on 11/24/2011 09:44:31 PM:
As far as I can see, ixgbe binds queues to physical cpu, so let
consider:
vhost thread transmits packets of flow A on processor M
during packet transmission, ixgbe driver
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
of flow A
Thanks for
From: Krishna Kumar2 krkum...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0
27 matches
Mail list logo
