On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:46:04PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-15 17:39:08 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:28:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2022-08-15 17:04:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > So virtio has a queue_size regis
Hi,
On 2022-08-15 17:39:08 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:28:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-08-15 17:04:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > So virtio has a queue_size register. When read, it will give you
> > > originally the maximum queue size. N
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:28:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-15 17:04:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > So virtio has a queue_size register. When read, it will give you
> > originally the maximum queue size. Normally we just read it and
> > use it as queue size.
> >
>
Hi,
On 2022-08-15 17:04:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> So virtio has a queue_size register. When read, it will give you
> originally the maximum queue size. Normally we just read it and
> use it as queue size.
>
> However, when queue memory allocation fails, and unconditionally with a
> ne
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:50:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 04:42:51PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:34:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > This reverts comm
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 04:42:51PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:34:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 762faee5a2678559d3dc09d95f8f2c54cd0466a7.
> > >
> > > This has been
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:34:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This reverts commit 762faee5a2678559d3dc09d95f8f2c54cd0466a7.
> >
> > This has been reported to trip up guests on GCP (Google Cloud). Why is
> > not yet clear -
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This reverts commit 762faee5a2678559d3dc09d95f8f2c54cd0466a7.
>
> This has been reported to trip up guests on GCP (Google Cloud). Why is
> not yet clear - to be debugged, but the patch itself has several other
> issues:
>
> -
This reverts commit 762faee5a2678559d3dc09d95f8f2c54cd0466a7.
This has been reported to trip up guests on GCP (Google Cloud). Why is
not yet clear - to be debugged, but the patch itself has several other
issues:
- It treats unknown speed as < 10G
- It leaves userspace no way to find out the ring