* Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the last version of it received no comments on the interfaces,
here it goes a version, that I feel ready for inclusion.
The comments regarding style, specially the elimination of the
#defines in the desc_struct definition were
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo, in the absense of further complaints, could you please push
to the x86 tree?
yeah, i've added them.
the patches cause a spontaneous reboot on x86 64-bit, around the time
when bootup hits user-space. It's due to one of the 25
before i pulled the patches i narrowed the problem down to one of the
last ~6 patches in your 25-patch series. I couldnt continue bisecting it
when i saw that process_64.c warning.
Ingo
___
Virtualization mailing list
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo, in the absense of further complaints, could you please push to
the x86 tree?
yeah, i've added them.
the patches cause a spontaneous reboot on x86 64-bit,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
Since the last version of it received no comments on the interfaces, here
it goes a version, that I feel ready for inclusion.
The comments regarding style, specially the elimination of the #defines in
the desc_struct definition were merged. I also implemented
Hi,
this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends
across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a
side-effect for x86_64.
I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing
effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old
