On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:03:27PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com
I don't think it's worth it.
The oldest gcc I happened to have around is 4.3.3
which is already smart enough to generate
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:03:27 +0800
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Why?
Thanks,
Rusty.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Stephen Hemminger shemmin...@vyatta.com writes:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:03:27 +0800
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +-
1 file
On 12/06/2012 07:21 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Why?
OK, I saw your comments, and I dropped this patch already.
Thanks,
Wanlong Gao
Thanks,
Rusty.
to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index e3ecc94..7681fe3
