On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:00:48AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> They're generic concepts, so hoist them. This also avoids accessor
> functions.
>
> This goes even further than Jason Wang's 17bb6d4088 patch
> ("virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue") which moved the
> queue_index from
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:00:48AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> * @priv: a pointer for the virtqueue implementation to use.
>> + * @index: the zero-based ordinal number for this queue.
>> + * @num_free: number of buffers we expect to be able to fit.
>
> Only it's
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:00:48AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> They're generic concepts, so hoist them. This also avoids accessor
> functions.
>
> This goes even further than Jason Wang's 17bb6d4088 patch
> ("virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue") which moved the
> queue_index from
They're generic concepts, so hoist them. This also avoids accessor
functions.
This goes even further than Jason Wang's 17bb6d4088 patch
("virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue") which moved the
queue_index from the specific transport.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell
---
drivers/virtio/
