On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:15:19 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) Dec 08 2009 [11:46:10], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:32:46 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:13:25], Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:24:23], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2 Dec
On (Tue) Dec 08 2009 [11:46:10], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:32:46 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:13:25], Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:24:23], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:54:06 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > > On (Wed) Dec 02
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:32:46 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:13:25], Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:24:23], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:54:06 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > On (Wed) Dec 02 2009 [14:14:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 28 Nov
On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:13:25], Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:24:23], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:54:06 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Wed) Dec 02 2009 [14:14:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > > The console co
On (Thu) Dec 03 2009 [09:24:23], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:54:06 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Wed) Dec 02 2009 [14:14:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
> > > > this
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:54:06 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) Dec 02 2009 [14:14:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > > The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
> > > this situation by buffering the data.
> >
> > All this complexity ma
On (Wed) Dec 02 2009 [14:14:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
> > this situation by buffering the data.
>
> All this complexity makes me really wonder if we should just
> have the host say t
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
> this situation by buffering the data.
All this complexity makes me really wonder if we should just
have the host say the max # ports it will ever use, and just do this
really dumbly.
The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
this situation by buffering the data.
We move from the per-port inbuf to a per-device queue of buffers,
shared by all the ports for that device, ready to receive host data.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c |