On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:08:13PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/12/20 16:49, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/12/20 00:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
It's quite easy to NAK a patch too, just reply saying "no" and it'll be
dropped (just like
On 04/12/20 16:49, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/12/20 00:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
It's quite easy to NAK a patch too, just reply saying "no" and it'll be
dropped (just like this patch was dropped right after your first reply)
so the
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 10:49 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 01/12/20 00:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >
> > > It's quite easy to NAK a patch too, just reply saying "no" and it'll be
> > > dropped (just like this patch was dropped
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/12/20 00:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
It's quite easy to NAK a patch too, just reply saying "no" and it'll be
dropped (just like this patch was dropped right after your first reply)
so the burden on maintainers is minimal.
The
On 01/12/20 00:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
It's quite easy to NAK a patch too, just reply saying "no" and it'll be
dropped (just like this patch was dropped right after your first reply)
so the burden on maintainers is minimal.
The maintainers are _already_ marking patches with "Cc: stable". That
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:29:02PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 30/11/20 20:44, Mike Christie wrote:
I have never seen a public/open-source vhost-scsi testsuite.
For patch 23 (the one that adds the lun reset support which is built on
patch 22), we can't add it to stable right now if you
On 30/11/20 20:44, Mike Christie wrote:
I have never seen a public/open-source vhost-scsi testsuite.
For patch 23 (the one that adds the lun reset support which is built on
patch 22), we can't add it to stable right now if you wanted to, because
it has a bug in it. Michael T, sent the fix:
On 30/11/20 18:38, Sasha Levin wrote:
I am not aware of any public CI being done _at all_ done on
vhost-scsi, by CKI or everyone else. So autoselection should be done
only on subsystems that have very high coverage in CI.
Where can I find a testsuite for virtio/vhost? I see one for KVM, but
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:33:46AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/11/20 22:06, Sasha Levin wrote:
Plus all the testing we have for the stable trees, yes. It goes beyond
just compiling at this point.
Your very own co-workers (https://cki-project.org/) are pushing hard on
this effort around
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 30/11/20 14:57, Greg KH wrote:
Every patch should be "fixing a real issue"---even a new feature. But the
larger the patch, the more the submitters and maintainers should be trusted
rather than a bot. The line between feature
On 30/11/20 14:57, Greg KH wrote:
Every patch should be "fixing a real issue"---even a new feature. But the
larger the patch, the more the submitters and maintainers should be trusted
rather than a bot. The line between feature and bugfix_sometimes_ is
blurry, I would say that in this case
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 30/11/20 14:28, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Lines of code is not everything. If you think that this needs additional
> > > > testing then that's fine and we can drop it, but not picking up a fix
> > > > just because it's 120 lines is
On 30/11/20 14:28, Greg KH wrote:
Lines of code is not everything. If you think that this needs additional
testing then that's fine and we can drop it, but not picking up a fix
just because it's 120 lines is not something we'd do.
Starting with the first two steps in stable-kernel-rules.rst:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:33:46AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/11/20 22:06, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 29/11/20 05:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > > Which doesn't seem to be suitable for stable either... Patch 3/5 in
> > >
On 29/11/20 22:06, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/11/20 05:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
Which doesn't seem to be suitable for stable either... Patch 3/5 in
Why not? It was sent as a fix to Linus.
Dunno, 120 lines of new code? Even if
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/11/20 05:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
Which doesn't seem to be suitable for stable either... Patch 3/5
in
Why not? It was sent as a fix to Linus.
Dunno, 120 lines of new code? Even if it's okay for an rc, I don't
see why it
On 29/11/20 05:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
Which doesn't seem to be suitable for stable either... Patch 3/5 in
Why not? It was sent as a fix to Linus.
Dunno, 120 lines of new code? Even if it's okay for an rc, I don't see
why it is would be backported to stable releases and release it without
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 07:08:54PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/11/20 19:01, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/11/20 16:35, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Mike Christie
[ Upstream commit 18f1becb6948cd411fd01968a0a54af63732e73c ]
Move
On 25/11/20 19:01, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/11/20 16:35, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Mike Christie
[ Upstream commit 18f1becb6948cd411fd01968a0a54af63732e73c ]
Move code to parse lun from req's lun_buf to helper, so tmf code
can
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/11/20 16:35, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Mike Christie
[ Upstream commit 18f1becb6948cd411fd01968a0a54af63732e73c ]
Move code to parse lun from req's lun_buf to helper, so tmf code
can use it in the next patch.
Signed-off-by:
On 25/11/20 16:35, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Mike Christie
[ Upstream commit 18f1becb6948cd411fd01968a0a54af63732e73c ]
Move code to parse lun from req's lun_buf to helper, so tmf code
can use it in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
Acked-by: Jason Wang
From: Mike Christie
[ Upstream commit 18f1becb6948cd411fd01968a0a54af63732e73c ]
Move code to parse lun from req's lun_buf to helper, so tmf code
can use it in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
Acked-by: Jason Wang
Link:
22 matches
Mail list logo
