Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-04-04 Thread David Miller
From: Ian Campbell Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:29:19 +0100 >>From 0b56469abe56efae415b4603ef508ce9aec0e4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ian Campbell > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:58:50 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] xen: netfront: assume all hw features are available until > backend connection setup >

Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-04-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 04:54 +0100, David Miller wrote: > From: Michał Mirosław > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:01:35 +0200 (CEST) > > > Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken > > as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. > > > > This will set GSO_ROBUST

Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-04-01 Thread David Miller
From: Michał Mirosław Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:01:35 +0200 (CEST) > Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken > as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. > > This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). > > RX checksu

[PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Mirosław
Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. This will set GSO_ROBUST at device creation time (earlier than connect time). RX checksum offload is forced on - so advertise as it is. Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław

Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-03-31 Thread Michał Mirosław
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 12:01 +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote: > > Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken > > as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. > Thanks, I've got a pending TODO item to

Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: convert xen-netfront to hw_features

2011-03-31 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 12:01 +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote: > Not tested in any way. The original code for offload setting seems broken > as it resets the features on every netback reconnect. Thanks, I've got a pending TODO item to test this and propagate similar changes to netback. I hope to get to