On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> [I am resending to fix the broken thread in the previous one.]
>
> This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk
> device accelerator. Compared to userspace virtio-blk implementation, vhost-bl
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> [I am resending to fix the broken thread in the previous one.]
>>
>> This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk
>> device acce
On 07/17/2012 11:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
Hi folks,
[I am resending to fix the broken thread in the previous one.]
This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk
device accelerator. Compared to usersp
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 04:55:06PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> [I am resending to fix the broken thread in the previous one.]
>
> This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk
> device accelerator. Compared to userspace virtio-blk implementation, vhost-bl
Hi Christoph,
On 07/14/2012 03:49 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Please send a version that does direct block I/O similar to xen-blkback
for now.
Seems xen-blkback converts the guest IO request to host bio and submit
them directly. I was wondering whether this has a performance gain
compared t
Please send a version that does direct block I/O similar to xen-blkback
for now. If we get proper in-kernel aio support one day you can add
back file backend support.
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://list
Hi folks,
[I am resending to fix the broken thread in the previous one.]
This patchset adds vhost-blk support. vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk
device accelerator. Compared to userspace virtio-blk implementation, vhost-blk
gives about 5% to 15% performance improvement.
Asias He (5):
aio: E
