On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest,
running
affected guest user applications are
On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This
On 21/11/13 15:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
On 21/11/13 07:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest,
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request queueing
when a lost block device is detected, resulting in
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Heinz Graalfs wrote:
Hi,
when an active virtio block device is hot-unplugged from a KVM guest, running
affected guest user applications are not aware of any errors that occur due
to the lost device. This patch-set adds code to avoid further request
