On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:29:32AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/20 上午5:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:12:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2019/8/12 下午5:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On 2019/8/20 上午5:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:12:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/8/12 下午5:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:4
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:12:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/12 下午5:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:26:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/13 下午7:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:31:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > > What kind of issues do you see? Spinlock is to synchronize GUP with MMU
> > > notifier in this series.
> > A GUP th
On 2019/8/14 上午12:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:57:07AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:31:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
What kind of issues do you see? Spinlock is to synchronize GUP with MMU
notifier in this series.
A GUP that can't sleep
On 2019/8/13 下午7:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:31:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
What kind of issues do you see? Spinlock is to synchronize GUP with MMU
notifier in this series.
A GUP that can't sleep can't pagefault which makes it a really weird
pattern
My understan
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:57:07AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:31:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> > What kind of issues do you see? Spinlock is to synchronize GUP with MMU
> > notifier in this series.
>
> A GUP that can't sleep can't pagefault which makes it a rea
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 04:31:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> What kind of issues do you see? Spinlock is to synchronize GUP with MMU
> notifier in this series.
A GUP that can't sleep can't pagefault which makes it a really weird
pattern
> Btw, back to the original question. May I know why synch
On 2019/8/12 下午9:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 05:49:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
Hi all:
This
On 2019/8/12 下午5:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
Hi all:
This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
accelrea
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 05:49:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > Hi all:
> > > >
> > > > This series tr
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:44:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > Hi all:
> > >
> > > This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
> > > accelreation series. Please
From: Jason Wang
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:44:51 +0800
> On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> At this point how about we revert
>> 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc
>> for this release, and then re-apply a corrected version
>> for the next one?
>
> If possible, consider we've
On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
Hi all:
This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
accelreation series. Please review.
Changes from V4:
- switch to use spinlock synchronize MMU notifier with accessor
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:54:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> I don't have any objection to convert to spinlock() but just want to
> know if any case that the above smp_mb() + counter looks good to you?
So how about we try this:
- revert the original patch for this release
- new safe patch with a
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
> accelreation series. Please review.
>
> Changes from V4:
> - switch to use spinlock synchronize MMU notifier with accessors
>
> Changes from V3:
> - remove th
Hi all:
This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
accelreation series. Please review.
Changes from V4:
- switch to use spinlock synchronize MMU notifier with accessors
Changes from V3:
- remove the unnecessary patch
Changes from V2:
- use seqlck helper to synchronize MMU not
17 matches
Mail list logo