Alexander Lobakin writes:
> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 12:37:54 +0100
>
>> Alexander Lobakin writes:
>>
>> > From: Alexander Lobakin
>> > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:23:23 +0200
>> >
>> >> From: Saeed Mahameed
>> >> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:57:22 -0700
>> >>
>> >>
Alexander Lobakin writes:
> From: Alexander Lobakin
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:23:23 +0200
>
>> From: Saeed Mahameed
>> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:57:22 -0700
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>> > XDP is going to always be eBPF based ! why not just report such stats
>> > to a special BPF_MAP ? BPF stack
On 8/4/21 12:27 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>
>> I just ran some quick tests with my setup and measured about 1.2%
>> worst
>
> 1.2% is a lot ! what was the test ? what is the change ?
I did say "quick test ... not exhaustive" and it was definitely
eyeballing a pps change over a small time
On 8/4/21 10:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:17:56 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
>> On 8/4/21 6:36 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
XDP is going to always be eBPF based ! why not just report such stats
to a special BPF_MAP ? BPF stack can collect the stats from the driver
On 8/4/21 6:36 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> XDP is going to always be eBPF based ! why not just report such stats
>> to a special BPF_MAP ? BPF stack can collect the stats from the driver
>> and report them to this special MAP upon user request.
> Do you mean replacing the ethtool-netlink /
