Jens Axboe writes:
> Rusty, do you want to ack this (and I'll slurp it up for 3.17) or take
> this yourself? Or something else?
I'm happy with the idea, and importantly, the new feature bit. So once
the implementation is tweaked, please add:
Acked-by: Rusty Russell
The new feature bi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:05:56PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-25 20:08, Ming Lei wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
> >virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
> >hardware queue.
> >
> >With this approach, both sc
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-25 20:08, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
>> virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
>> hardware queue.
>>
>> With this approach, both scalabili
On 2014-06-25 20:08, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi,
These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
hardware queue.
With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk
device can get improved.
For verifying t
Hi,
These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
hardware queue.
With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk
device can get improved.
For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk
