On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:27:40 +0800
Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com wrote:
Set timeout to 10:
non-smp guest with quick backend (1.2M/s) - about 490K/s)
That sounds like an awful lot. This is a 60% loss in throughput.
I don't think we can live with that.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description:
This patch increases the schedule timeout to 10 jiffies, it's more
appropriate, then other takes can easy to hold the mutex lock.
Signed-off-by: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
---
drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:02:29 +0800
Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch increases the schedule timeout to 10 jiffies, it's more
appropriate, then other takes can easy to hold the mutex lock.
Signed-off-by: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
---
drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 2 +-
1
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:02:29 +0800
Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch increases the schedule timeout to 10 jiffies, it's more
appropriate, then other takes can easy to hold the mutex lock.
Signed-off-by: Amos
