>
> On 2019/8/9 下午2:48, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer
> > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in
> > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the
> > 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer
> > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in
> > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the
> > 'next_avail_idx' to
On 2019/8/9 下午2:48, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer
from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in
virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the
'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unu
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer
> from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in
> virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the
> 'next_avail_idx' to the previous
This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer
from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in
virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the
'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer
is detatched from the vq.
Signe
