> Hmm. So it seems we need to first apply yours then this patch,
> is that right? Or the other way around? What is the right way to make it not
> break bisect?
> Do you mind including this patch with yours in a patchset
> in the correct order?
Ok, I'll create a patchset.
Thanks,
> > This function is used by virtio_vdpa as well
> > (drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c:virtio_vdpa_finalize_features).
> > A vDPA device can offer this feature and it will be accepted, even though
> > VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA is not a thing for the vDPA transport at the
> > moment.
> >
> > I
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 08:17:49AM +, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 4c3bb0ddeb9b..f9c6604352b4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -2752,6
Hi Viktor,
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 4c3bb0ddeb9b..f9c6604352b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,23 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> }
>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:49:23 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:50 PM Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> >
> > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> > notifications.
> >
> > In a
