On 05/31/10 09:46, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
>> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
>> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
>> Posting fo
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:36:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/30/10 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
> >> while reading through it:
> >>
> >> Rather t
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> > I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> > I think this addresses the cache bounce issue ra
On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
> Posting for early flames/comments.
Sorry, not without s
On 05/30/10 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
>> while reading through it:
>>
>> Rather than storing a pointer within the ring struct, pointing into a
>> position
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> > I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> > I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
>
On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
> Posting for early flames/comments.
>
> Generally, the Host end of th
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:07:52PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I missed the spec patch, can you repost it?
Still work in progress, but here it is.
Note I am still debating with myself whether we should split
avail idx and flags into separate cache lines.
diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.
On 05/26/2010 10:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
> Posting for early flames/comments.
>
> Generally, the Host end o
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
Posting for early flames/comments.
Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where
Guest is up to in
10 matches
Mail list logo