>
>
> > On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio
> > > patch :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by
> > > tag, but you can
> > take my acked-by + tested-by.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jakub Staron
> On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio
> > patch :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by
> > tag, but you can
> take my acked-by + tested-by.
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Staron
> Tested-by: Jakub
On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio patch
> :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by tag, but
> you can
take my acked-by + tested-by.
Acked-by: Jakub Staron
Tested-by: Jakub Staron
No
Hi Jakub,
>
> On 5/14/19 7:54 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > + if (!list_empty(>req_list)) {
> > + req_buf = list_first_entry(>req_list,
> > + struct virtio_pmem_request, list);
> > + req_buf->wq_buf_avail = true;
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:46:00PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > + vpmem->vdev = vdev;
> > > + vdev->priv = vpmem;
> > > + err = init_vq(vpmem);
> > > + if (err) {
> > > + dev_err(>dev, "failed to initialize virtio pmem vq's\n");
> > > + goto out_err;
> > > + }
> > >
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:25 AM Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
>
> > On 5/14/19 7:54 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > index 35897649c24f..94bad084ebab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -42,6
> On 5/14/19 7:54 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > index 35897649c24f..94bad084ebab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ config VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY
> >
> > If unsure, say
