On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 09:48:21AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Would make sense to rename blk_get_request() to blk_mq_alloc_request()
> and then we have API symmetry. The get/put don't make sense when there
> are no references involved.
>
> But it's a lot of churn for very little reward, which is
On 2/24/21 4:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 01:11:15PM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> The function blk_put_request() is just a wrapper to
>> blk_mq_free_request(), remove the unnecessary wrapper.
>>
>> Any feedback is welcome on this RFC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 01:11:15PM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> The function blk_put_request() is just a wrapper to
> blk_mq_free_request(), remove the unnecessary wrapper.
>
> Any feedback is welcome on this RFC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni
> ---
> block/blk-core.c
