> On 6 Mar 2019, at 23:42, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/6/2019 1:36 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/2019 1:26 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/6/2019 4:04 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> --- a/net/core/failover.c
> +++ b/net/core/failover.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
On 3/6/2019 1:26 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 3/6/2019 4:04 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
--- a/net/core/failover.c
+++ b/net/core/failover.c
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
static LIST_HEAD(failover_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(failover_lock);
+static bool slave_rename_ok = true;
+
+module_param(slave_rename_ok,
Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:50:59AM CET, si-wei@oracle.com wrote:
>When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
>master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened
>right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace
>(udev) may fail to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:15:06PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/2019 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:51:00PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/5/2019 4:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:20:50PM -0800, si-wei
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:51:00PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/2019 4:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:20:50PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/5/2019 4:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:35:50AM -0800, si-wei
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:20:50PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/2019 4:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:35:50AM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/5/2019 11:24 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:19:32 -0800
> > > > si-wei
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:35:50AM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/2019 11:24 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:19:32 -0800
> > si-wei liu wrote:
> >
> > > > I have a vague idea: would it work to *not* set
> > > > IFF_UP on slave devices at all?
> > > Hmm, I ever
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:19:32AM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/4/2019 6:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 07:50:59PM -0500, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > > When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
> > > master that is already up and
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:19:32 -0800
si-wei liu wrote:
> > I have a vague idea: would it work to *not* set
> > IFF_UP on slave devices at all?
> Hmm, I ever thought about this option, and it appears this solution is
> more invasive than required to convert existing scripts, despite the
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 07:50:59PM -0500, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
> master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened
> right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace
> (udev) may fail to
10 matches
Mail list logo
