Re: [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] smp, x86: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-15 Thread Jiang Liu
Hi Sebastian, Thanks for your review. The patch applies to the mainstream kernel, so seems there's difference between tip and the mainstream kernel. I will try to find the difference. And there's another patch for Xen, but I found the mail tile is wrong:( Please refer to:

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 19/19] smp, x86: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-11 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 05.12.13, Jiang Liu wrote: I like this in general however > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c > index 7cf1689..f241792 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c > @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector) > xen_vector =

[RFC PATCH v3 19/19] smp, x86: kill SMP single function call interrupt

2013-12-04 Thread Jiang Liu
Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so