On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:31:28PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:59 PM Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:02 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:06PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Stefano Garzarella
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:59 PM Jiang Wang . wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:02 AM Stefano Garzarella
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:06PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> > >On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Stefano Garzarella
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:02 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:06PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Stefano Garzarella
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >> >On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:17
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:06PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
>On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:17 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:26:03PM -0700, Jiang
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:17 AM Stefano Garzarella
> >wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:26:03PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> >I see. I will add some
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:17 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:26:03PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
[...]
>I see. I will add some limit to dgram packets. Also, when the
>virtqueues
>are shared between stream
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:17 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:26:03PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:52 AM Stefano Garzarella
> >wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:53:19AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >I was thinking if we
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:26:03PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:52 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:53:19AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
[...]
I was thinking if we don't add two new virtqueues, then maybe we don't
need to add new feature bit
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:52 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:53:19AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >Hi guys,
> >
> >I have one question about adding two new virtqueues for dgram. One new
> >thought is that we don't add two new virtqueues but keep using existing
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:39:36PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:50 AM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
> > > +For the rx side, dgram also uses the \field{buf_alloc}. If it is full,
> > > the packet
> > > +is dropped
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:53:19AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
Hi guys,
I have one question about adding two new virtqueues for dgram. One new
thought is that we don't add two new virtqueues but keep using existing
virtqueues for both stream and dgram.
At the beginning when I first thought
Hi guys,
I have one question about adding two new virtqueues for dgram. One new
thought is that we don't add two new virtqueues but keep using existing
virtqueues for both stream and dgram.
At the beginning when I first thought about supporting dgram, I thought
adding two new virtqueues would be
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:49 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:06:02AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:16 AM Stefano Garzarella
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jiang,
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:40:46PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >> >Hi Stefano,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:06:02AM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:16 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi Jiang,
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:40:46PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
>Hi Stefano,
>
>I checked the VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF feature bit and I think vsock
>dgram can use
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:16 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> Hi Jiang,
>
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:40:46PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> >Hi Stefano,
> >
> >I checked the VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF feature bit and I think vsock
> >dgram can use that feature too.
>
> Cool, thanks for checking!
NP.
Hi Jiang,
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:40:46PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I checked the VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF feature bit and I think vsock
dgram can use that feature too.
Cool, thanks for checking!
Do we want to make this feature a must-have or optional? One idea is
to make it
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:38 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:20:07AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:57:06AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:58:34PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 13,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:20:07AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:57:06AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:58:34PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:57:06AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:58:34PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:00:50PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:58 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:58:34PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:58 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:03:51PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:50:45AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:58:53PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:58:53PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:42:23PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:16:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:58:53PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:42:23PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:21 AM Stefano Garzarella
wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:58:53PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:42:23PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:21 AM Stefano Garzarella
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Apr
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:42:23PM -0700, Jiang Wang . wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:21 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
>> Add supports for datagram type for
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:21 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
> >> Add supports for datagram type for virtio-vsock. Datagram
> >> sockets are connectionless and
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:50 AM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
> > Add supports for datagram type for virtio-vsock. Datagram
> > sockets are connectionless and unreliable. To avoid contention
> > with stream and other sockets, add two more
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
Add supports for datagram type for virtio-vsock. Datagram
sockets are connectionless and unreliable. To avoid contention
with stream and other sockets, add two more
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:36:02AM +, jiang.wang wrote:
> Add supports for datagram type for virtio-vsock. Datagram
> sockets are connectionless and unreliable. To avoid contention
> with stream and other sockets, add two more virtqueues and
> a new feature bit to identify if those two new
Add supports for datagram type for virtio-vsock. Datagram
sockets are connectionless and unreliable. To avoid contention
with stream and other sockets, add two more virtqueues and
a new feature bit to identify if those two new queues exist or not.
Also add descriptions for resource management of
33 matches
Mail list logo