在 2022/9/1 13:54, Guo Zhi 写道:
Follow VIRTIO 1.1 spec, only writing out a single used ring for a batch
of descriptors.

Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1...@sjtu.edu.cn>
---
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 40097826cff0..26862c8bf751 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2376,10 +2376,20 @@ static int __vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue 
*vq,
        vring_used_elem_t __user *used;
        u16 old, new;
        int start;
+       int copy_n = count;
+ /**
+        * If in order feature negotiated, devices can notify the use of a 
batch of buffers to
+        * the driver by only writing out a single used ring entry with the id 
corresponding
+        * to the head entry of the descriptor chain describing the last buffer 
in the batch.
+        */
+       if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
+               copy_n = 1;
+               heads = &heads[count - 1];
+       }


Would it better to have a dedicated helper like vhost_add_used_in_order() here?


        start = vq->last_used_idx & (vq->num - 1);
        used = vq->used->ring + start;
-       if (vhost_put_used(vq, heads, start, count)) {
+       if (vhost_put_used(vq, heads, start, copy_n)) {
                vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used");
                return -EFAULT;
        }
@@ -2388,7 +2398,7 @@ static int __vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
                smp_wmb();
                /* Log used ring entry write. */
                log_used(vq, ((void __user *)used - (void __user *)vq->used),
-                        count * sizeof *used);
+                        copy_n * sizeof(*used));
        }
        old = vq->last_used_idx;
        new = (vq->last_used_idx += count);
@@ -2410,7 +2420,7 @@ int vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct 
vring_used_elem *heads,
start = vq->last_used_idx & (vq->num - 1);
        n = vq->num - start;
-       if (n < count) {
+       if (n < count && !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {


This seems strange, any reason for this? (Actually if we support in-order we only need one used slot which fit for the case here)

Thanks


                r = __vhost_add_used_n(vq, heads, n);
                if (r < 0)
                        return r;

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to