Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-12 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: >> I guess if we did the s/XEN_DOM0/LOCAL_APIC && IO_APIC && ACPI/ in >> arch/x86/pci/xen.c it would be pretty easy to review for equivalence. >> Then keep CONFIG_PRIVILIGED, but drop XEN_DOM0 from everywher

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-12 Thread Andrew Jones
- Original Message - > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19:11PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > > > If the root complaint is that "customers think that anything > > > > set in > > > > .config is a supported feature", then the solutions are to > > > > support > > > > all > > > > the fe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-11 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19:11PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > If the root complaint is that "customers think that anything set in > > > .config is a supported feature", then the solutions are to support > > > all > > > the features in .config, re-educate the customers that they're wr

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-11 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > If the root complaint is that "customers think that anything set in > > .config is a supported feature", then the solutions are to support > > all > > the features in .config, re-educate the customers that they're wrong, > > or > > maintain a local patch to do this stuff. > > If only re-educat

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-11 Thread Andrew Jones
- Original Message - > On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > >> I guess if we did the s/XEN_DOM0/LOCAL_APIC && IO_APIC && ACPI/ in > >> arch/x86/pci/xen.c it would be pretty easy to review for > >> equivalence. > >> Then keep CONFI

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > I guess if we did the s/XEN_DOM0/LOCAL_APIC && IO_APIC && ACPI/ in > arch/x86/pci/xen.c it would be pretty easy to review for equivalence. > Then keep CONFIG_PRIVILIGED, but drop XEN_DOM0 from everywhere else and > compile in the 3 files. I don't think it m

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:12:10PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > I don't think we should add "PCI_XEN && SWIOT

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Andrew Jones
- Original Message - > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:12:10PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini > > > wrote: > > > > I don't think we should add "PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN && >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Andrew Jones
- Original Message - > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > I don't think we should add "PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN && > > > X86_LOCAL_APIC && > > > X86_IO_APIC && ACPI && PCI" to XEN either. > > > Howev

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:12:10PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > I don't think we should add "PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN && X86_LOCAL_APIC && > > > X86_IO_APIC && ACPI &&

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > I don't think we should add "PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN && X86_LOCAL_APIC && > > X86_IO_APIC && ACPI && PCI" to XEN either. > > However it should be possible to add only the right

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:39:44AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > > XEN_DOM0 is a silent option that has been automatically selected > > > > when > > > > CONFIG_XEN is se

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > XEN_DOM0 is a silent option that has been automatically selected > > > when > > > CONFIG_XEN is selected since 6b0661a5e6fbf. If this option was > > > changed > > > to a menu con

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-09 Thread Andrew Jones
- Original Message - > On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Andrew Jones wrote: > > XEN_DOM0 is a silent option that has been automatically selected > > when > > CONFIG_XEN is selected since 6b0661a5e6fbf. If this option was > > changed > > to a menu configurable option then it would only give users the >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

2012-01-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:39 +, Andrew Jones wrote: > remove XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST as it's just an alias for XEN_DOM0. Hmm, this one is used by tools like update-grub to know when it is ok to create xen+kernel entries so I think it needs to stay, or we at least need to give lengthly warning to d