On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi
> /* Running on a P/390 ? */
> if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.machine == 0x7490)
> machine_flags |= 4;
> +
> + /* Running under KVM ? */
> + if (cpuin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:37:19PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
>>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi
>>> /* Running on a P/390 ? */
>>> if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.machine == 0x749
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi
>> /* Running on a P/390 ? */
>> if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.machine == 0x7490)
>> machine_flags |= 4;
>> +
>> +/* Running und
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:37:19PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
@@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi
/* Running on a P/390 ? */
if (cp
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:59:32PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:37:19PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> >> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits?
> It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers
> we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time
> to time... but that didn't hurt enough yet, obviously.
> But now that yo
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:12:04PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since when do we have symbolic names for the bits?
>> It was always on my todo list to do a cleanup and replace the numbers
>> we use everywhere with names. Especially since we have clashes from time
>> to t
Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 15:06 +0100 schrieb Heiko Carstens:
> Just introduce something like MACHINE_FLAG_KVM. The rest can be converted
> later. Unless you're bored and feel like fiddling around with assembly code :)
I've done that patch this morning already, see below. I agree with HCH
that we
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 15:06 +0100 schrieb Heiko Carstens:
> > Just introduce something like MACHINE_FLAG_KVM. The rest can be converted
> > later. Unless you're bored and feel like fiddling around with assembly code
> > :)
> I'v
