On Monday, December 03, 2012 08:01:11 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 11/27/2012 01:37
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:46 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> >
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > > >
>
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:49:19 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > >> Some deivces do not free the old tx sk
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:30:13 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 11/28/2012 12:4
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:13:13PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
> >
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> >
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
>
> Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang wrote:
> > >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemm
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> >>> Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>
>
On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually i
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> >> (usually in tx interrupt). One such examp
On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old tx
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
> virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending.
> This
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. This
would lead the pktgen to wait forever in the refcount of the skb
12 matches
Mail list logo