Re: [virtio-comment] Re: virtio-sound linux driver conformance to spec

2023-09-24 Thread Anton Yakovlev via Virtualization
Hello Stefan, On 20.09.2023 00:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: As an aside, here are two other statements that have a similar issue: - 2.6.1.1.2 "the driver MAY release any resource associated with that virtqueue" (instead 2.6.1.1.1 should have something like "After a queue has been reset by the dr

Re: [virtio-comment] Re: virtio-sound linux driver conformance to spec

2023-09-24 Thread Anton Yakovlev via Virtualization
Hello Paolo, On 19.09.2023 15:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 9/19/23 02:35, Anton Yakovlev wrote: If the Linux virtio sound driver violates a specification, then there must be a conformance statement that the driver does not follow. As far as I know, there is no such thing at the moment. There

Re: [virtio-comment] Re: virtio-sound linux driver conformance to spec

2023-09-19 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 08:58:32AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 9/19/23 02:35, Anton Yakovlev wrote: > > > > If the Linux virtio sound driver violates a specification, then there > > must be > > a conformance statement that the driver does not follow. As far as I know, > > there is no such thi

Re: [virtio-comment] Re: virtio-sound linux driver conformance to spec

2023-09-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 9/19/23 02:35, Anton Yakovlev wrote: If the Linux virtio sound driver violates a specification, then there must be a conformance statement that the driver does not follow. As far as I know, there is no such thing at the moment. There is one in 2.7.13.3: "The device MAY access the descript