Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >>> Although, looking at it again, I did miss this line: >>> >>> (XEN) mm.c:645:d341 Non-privileged (341) attempt to map I/O space >>> 000d2e50 >>> >> Good, that's what I was hoping to see. (Well, actually not that >> *particula

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Although, looking at it again, I did miss this line: >> >> (XEN) mm.c:645:d341 Non-privileged (341) attempt to map I/O space >> 000d2e50 > > Good, that's what I was hoping to see. (Well, actually not that > *particular* message, which is strange, but some explanato

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Were there any other errors/warnings printed here? >>> >>> Nope. Just some whitespace. >> >> Are you sure? Could you send a full xm dmesg log output? The crash >> is from a BUG() caused by a failing hypercall. Since you have >> comp

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>> Were there any other errors/warnings printed here? >> >> Nope. Just some whitespace. > > Are you sure? Could you send a full xm dmesg log output? The crash is > from a BUG() caused by a failing hypercall. Since you have compiled Xen > with debug enabled, it sho

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Is this consistent or sporadic? > > Consistently fails to boot, across a few test boxes, slightly > different Xen versions -- all around Xen 3.2.1, same config. > >> Does it depend on how much guest memory you give it? > > No. Tried wit

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Is this consistent or sporadic? Consistently fails to boot, across a few test boxes, slightly different Xen versions -- all around Xen 3.2.1, same config. > Does it depend on how much guest memory you give it? No. Tried with 128, 360, 5000. They all fail in the

Re: 2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Christopher S. Aker wrote: > Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit > Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae > DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c > Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf". > Started domain xencaker Is this consistent or sporadic? Does it d

2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap

Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf". Started domain xencaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# xm dmesg ... (XE