Re: Proposal for virtio standardization.

2012-10-10 Thread Rusty Russell
Cornelia Huck writes: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:59:33 +0930 > Rusty Russell wrote: >> 3) Various clarifications, formalizations and cleanups to the spec text, >>and possibly elimination of old deprecated features. >> >> 4) The only significant change to the spec is that we use PCI >>capab

Re: Proposal for virtio standardization.

2012-10-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:59:33 +0930 Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I've had several requests for a more formal approach to the > virtio draft spec, and (after some soul-searching) I'd like to try that. > > The proposal is to use OASIS as the standards body, as it's > fairly light

Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization.

2012-10-04 Thread Anthony Liguori
Rusty Russell writes: > Hi all, > > I've had several requests for a more formal approach to the > virtio draft spec, and (after some soul-searching) I'd like to try that. > > The proposal is to use OASIS as the standards body, as it's > fairly light-weight as these things go. For me

Proposal for virtio standardization.

2012-09-26 Thread Rusty Russell
Hi all, I've had several requests for a more formal approach to the virtio draft spec, and (after some soul-searching) I'd like to try that. The proposal is to use OASIS as the standards body, as it's fairly light-weight as these things go. For me this means paperwork and setting