On (Tue) 25 Sep 2012 [14:55:04], Rusty Russell wrote:
> Amit Shah writes:
>
> > On (Mon) 24 Sep 2012 [23:50:01], Sjur BRENDELAND wrote:
> >> Hi Amit,
> >>
> >> > I'm sorry for not being able to look at this earlier.
> >>
> >> No worries. I'll try to respin and retest this patch by tomorrow.
> >
Amit Shah writes:
> On (Mon) 24 Sep 2012 [23:50:01], Sjur BRENDELAND wrote:
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> > I'm sorry for not being able to look at this earlier.
>>
>> No worries. I'll try to respin and retest this patch by tomorrow.
>> If you by any chance could find time to review so could make it in tim
On (Mon) 24 Sep 2012 [23:50:01], Sjur BRENDELAND wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> > I'm sorry for not being able to look at this earlier.
>
> No worries. I'll try to respin and retest this patch by tomorrow.
> If you by any chance could find time to review so could make it in time
> for 3.7 it would be grea
Hi Amit,
> I'm sorry for not being able to look at this earlier.
No worries. I'll try to respin and retest this patch by tomorrow.
If you by any chance could find time to review so could make it in time
for 3.7 it would be great :-)
> A general comment is to base this patchset on linux-next; we'
Hi Sjur,
I'm sorry for not being able to look at this earlier.
A general comment is to base this patchset on linux-next; we've been
seeing more than usual activity for virtio_console this time around.
I don't expect the conflicts to be big, though.
On (Mon) 24 Sep 2012 [14:33:07], sjur.brandel..
