Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] SCSI Performance regression [was Re: [PATCH 0/6] tcm_vhost/virtio-scsi WIP code for-3.6]

2012-07-16 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, James Bottomley wrote: > What people might pay attention to is evidence that there's a problem in > 3.5-rc6 (without any OFED crap). If you're not going to bother > investigating, it has to be in an environment they can reproduce (so > ordinary hardware, not infiniband) otherw

Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] SCSI Performance regression [was Re: [PATCH 0/6] tcm_vhost/virtio-scsi WIP code for-3.6]

2012-07-06 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:30 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, James Bottomley wrote: > > > What people might pay attention to is evidence that there's a problem in > > 3.5-rc6 (without any OFED crap). If you're not going to bother > > investigating, it has to be in an environm

Re: SCSI Performance regression [was Re: [PATCH 0/6] tcm_vhost/virtio-scsi WIP code for-3.6]

2012-07-06 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 17:49 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 02:13 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 09:43 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 20:01 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > > > This bottleneck has been

Re: SCSI Performance regression [was Re: [PATCH 0/6] tcm_vhost/virtio-scsi WIP code for-3.6]

2012-07-06 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 09:43 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 20:01 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > So I'm pretty sure this discrepancy is attributed to the small block > > random I/O bottleneck currently present for all Linux/SCSI core LLDs > > regardless of physical