On Sunday 06 April 2008 12:56:33 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 06 April 2008 00:53:39 Balaji Rao wrote:
> > On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:21 pm Balaji Rao wrote:
> > > Hi Rusty,
> > >
> > > I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using
> > > kvm with -smp 4.
> > >
> >
On Sunday 06 April 2008 00:53:39 Balaji Rao wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:21 pm Balaji Rao wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using
> > kvm with -smp 4.
> >
> > static void vring_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > {
> >
On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:21 pm Balaji Rao wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using kvm
> with -smp 4.
>
> static void vring_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> START_USE(v
Hi Rusty,
I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using kvm with
-smp 4.
static void vring_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
START_USE(vq);
-->BUG_ON(vq->vring.avail->flags & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)
