Re: v4.14.21+: ATOMIC_SLEEP splat bisected to 9428088c90b6 ("drm/qxl: reapply cursor after resetting primary")

2018-06-17 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 12:33 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 17 June 2018 at 21:02, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >> On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 11:36 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > >> > > >> > And if you revert that patch, does everything work again? > >>

Re: v4.14.21+: ATOMIC_SLEEP splat bisected to 9428088c90b6 ("drm/qxl: reapply cursor after resetting primary")

2018-06-17 Thread Dave Airlie
On 17 June 2018 at 21:02, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 11:36 +0200, Greg KH wrote: >> > >> > And if you revert that patch, does everything work again? >> >> Yes. > > Great, Dave, care to revert this in 4.18 so I can

Re: v4.14.21+: ATOMIC_SLEEP splat bisected to 9428088c90b6 ("drm/qxl: reapply cursor after resetting primary")

2018-06-17 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 11:36 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > And if you revert that patch, does everything work again? > > Yes. Great, Dave, care to revert this in 4.18 so I can queue up that revert in older kernels as well?

Re: v4.14.21+: ATOMIC_SLEEP splat bisected to 9428088c90b6 ("drm/qxl: reapply cursor after resetting primary")

2018-06-17 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sun, 2018-06-17 at 11:36 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > And if you revert that patch, does everything work again? Yes. -Mike ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

Re: v4.14.21+: ATOMIC_SLEEP splat bisected to 9428088c90b6 ("drm/qxl: reapply cursor after resetting primary")

2018-06-17 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 05:39:11PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Greetings, > > Running a kernel with ATOMIC_SLEEP enabled in one of my VMs, I met the > splat below. I tracked it back to 4.14-stable, and bisected it there. Why does your virtual machine use a drm driver? Ah, it's a driver for