On 5/28/24 10:21 PM, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 21:35 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/24 7:59 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:52, Jingbo Xu
>>> wrote:
Hi Peter-Jan,
On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 21:35 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 5/28/24 7:59 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:52, Jingbo Xu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Peter-Jan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the amazing work.
> > >
> > >
On 5/28/24 7:59 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:52, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter-Jan,
>>
>> Thanks for the amazing work.
>>
>> I'd just like to know if you have any plan of making fiq and fiq->lock
>> more scalable, e.g. make fiq a per-CPU software queue?
>
> Doing a p
On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 14:39, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote:
> I am not that familiar yet with the FUSE driver. What are these
> listeners you are referring to? If I follow a FUSE file system operation
> like fuse_statfs, I see a single-threaded path towards the
> wake_pending_and_unlock of virtio-fs v
On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 13:59 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:52, Jingbo Xu
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter-Jan,
> >
> > Thanks for the amazing work.
> >
> > I'd just like to know if you have any plan of making fi
On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 10:52, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>
> Hi Peter-Jan,
>
> Thanks for the amazing work.
>
> I'd just like to know if you have any plan of making fiq and fiq->lock
> more scalable, e.g. make fiq a per-CPU software queue?
Doing a per-CPU queue is not necessarily a good idea: async request
On 5/28/24 5:05 PM, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote:
> Hi Jingbo,
>
> On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 16:40 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> Hi Peter-Jan,
>>
>> Thanks for the amazing work! Glad to see it is upstreamed. We are
>> also
>> planning distr
Hi Jingbo,
On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 16:40 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi Peter-Jan,
>
> Thanks for the amazing work! Glad to see it is upstreamed. We are
> also
> planning distribute virtiofs on DPU.
Great to hear that virtio-fs is gett
Hi Peter-Jan,
Thanks for the amazing work.
I'd just like to know if you have any plan of making fiq and fiq->lock
more scalable, e.g. make fiq a per-CPU software queue? I think the
global fiq and fiq->lock can be a performance bottleneck after we have
supported mq.
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Hi Peter-Jan,
Thanks for the amazing work! Glad to see it is upstreamed. We are also
planning distribute virtiofs on DPU.
BTW I have some questions when reading the patch, appreciate if you
could give a hint.
On 5/1/24 11:38 PM, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote:
> Virtio-fs devices might allocate signi
10 matches
Mail list logo
