Re: Next test kit

2000-03-01 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 11:56 PM -0500 3/1/2000, Charles Bailey wrote: >I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course) >from the current repository with all patches to date except the >revised pipe PPFs So that's 5.5.670 plus your changes and anything else applied to the repository today? >BTW, I

Next test kit

2000-03-01 Thread Charles Bailey
I cobbled together a new test kit (vmsperl_pre56_2.tgz, of course) from the current repository with all patches to date except the revised pipe PPFs (waiting for Charles Lane's new stuff; BTW, could we just use a read-only DCL procedure, say Perl_Root:[lib]start_subprocess.com, instead of writing

5.5.670, objXSUB.h, taint test failures

2000-03-01 Thread Craig A. Berry
As always, my environment is DEC C V5.2-003 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.1. Building an extension (DBI) against 5.5.670 fails with: #include "objXSUB.h" .^ %CC-F-NOINCLFILE, Cannot find file "objXSUB.h" specified in #include directive. at line number 234 in file PERL_ROOT:[LIB.VMS_AXP.5_005670.CORE]XSUB.

Re: CPAN Upload: GSAR/perl-5.5.670.tar.gz

2000-03-01 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 04:03 PM 3/1/00 -0500, lane @ DUPHY4.Physics.Drexel.Edu wrote: >"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The only patch that was omitted because of my patching skills I repeat here > > (still don't know why applying it failed): > > > > --- t/pragma/warn/pp_ctl.orig Tue Feb 29 12:43:44

5.5.670 build

2000-03-01 Thread Craig A. Berry
I get a successful build with the following 2 test failures, then that all-too-familiar hang. My environment is DEC C 5.2, VMS AXP 7.1, configured with -des. [.comp]script...FAILED on test 1 [.io]openpidFAILED on test 8 The first one can be fixed by: --- t/comp/script.t;-